Grammarly's AI Expert Review Allegedly Used Journalists' and Authors' Names Without Consent
- Date of incident
- March 11, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- US-NY
- Sources
- 6 cited
- Last verified
- May 21, 2026
Summary
Grammarly's Expert Review feature allegedly used a large language model to generate editing suggestions presented under the names of journalists, authors, and academics without their consent. A federal class action filed by Julia Angwin claimed the feature misappropriated identities for commercial gain and attributed advice the named individuals never gave.
What is reported
Grammarly's Expert Review feature allegedly used a large language model to generate editing suggestions presented under the names of journalists, authors, and academics without their consent. A federal class action filed by Julia Angwin claimed the feature misappropriated identities for commercial gain and attributed advice the named individuals never gave.
Editorial note
Strongest record in the pull. Five-source triangulation, named plaintiff, filed in SDNY.
Sources
This record summarizes the cited reports. See the sources panel for the underlying URLs and archive copies.
Sources
- 01bbc.com — Grammarly pulls AI author-impersonation tool after backlashsecondary3/12/2026
- 02nytimes.com — Why I’m Suing Grammarlysecondary3/13/2026
- 03